The refutation and concession

1. What is my thesis?
Classical music has positive effect on human.



2. What is the opposite position?
There are another disease or phenomenon that can refute this.



3. What arguments can I anticipate?
 Williams Syndrome.
 Personal taste.



4. How will I counter those arguments?
Williams Syndrome is not general case and rather than Williams Syndrome, Mozart effect is much general.
We don't have to be regulated to Mozart's music.



My Refutation and concession

 Although the study about Mozart effect and the effect of the classical music is widely done, there are opponents who disagree with the effect of the classical music. Especailly toward the Mozart's effect, some ciritics such as Dr. Daniel Levitin suggest the case of Williams Syndrome. Originally Mozart's effect argues that there is link or connection between the classical music and high intelligence. But according to Dr. Daniel Levitin, it is not. People with the Williams Syndrome has quite low intelligence but they are frequently musically gifted. He suggested one patient of him, Levitin, he even can't open the case of clarinet, but if someone offers it, he can play it remarkably well.

 This arguement can refute the effect of the classical music. But I want to insist that there is always exception and classical music's effect is not only limited to intelligence. As I already wrote, there are so many other effect of classical music.

Also there are some opinions that effect of the music depends on the personal taste. Personal taste can be variant but generally classical music has effect on human like calming.